Pedagogical Mechanisms for Teaching Legal English Based on Artificial Intelligence
Keywords:
artificial intelligence, Legal English, legal terminology, pedagogical mechanisms, language teaching, professional communication, adaptive learning, AI-powered education, legal text analysis, digital learning technologies.Abstract
This article examines the pedagogical mechanisms for teaching Legal English through artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in higher education. Particular attention is given to the development of legal terminology, professional communication skills, reading comprehension, academic writing, and the ability to interpret legal texts in English. The study explores the potential of AI-powered tools, including intelligent tutoring systems, conversational AI, automated writing assistants, and adaptive learning platforms, to personalize instruction and provide timely feedback based on students’ individual learning needs. It also considers the integration of AI into case-based learning, legal simulations, terminology acquisition, and professional communication activities. Furthermore, the article highlights the importance of the teacher’s role in selecting appropriate AI tools, verifying the accuracy of generated information, and ensuring the responsible use of digital technologies. Particular emphasis is placed on addressing challenges related to legal accuracy, data privacy, academic integrity, and students’ independent thinking. The article concludes that the purposeful integration of artificial intelligence into Legal English instruction can support a more interactive, learner-centered, and professionally oriented learning environment when combined with sound pedagogical principles and appropriate teacher supervision.
References
1. Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centred Approach. Cambridge University Press.
2. Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cambridge University Press.
3. Tiersma, P. M. (1999). Legal Language. University of Chicago Press.
4. Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment—Companion Volume. Council of Europe Publishing.
5. UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. UNESCO.
6. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
7. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
8. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
