MODERN TRENDS IN RUSSIAN PHRASEOLOGY: SEMANTICS, CULTURAL MARKEDNESS AND DIDACTIC POTENTIAL
Abstract
The article examines current trends in Russian phraseology, focusing on semantic complexity, mechanisms of ambiguity, cultural markedness, and the didactic value of phraseological units in teaching Russian as a foreign language. A comprehensive linguistic approach reveals how idiomatic expressions accumulate cultural meanings, maintain semantic stability while demonstrating contextual flexibility, and contribute to the development of communicative competence among foreign learners. The study identifies key directions in the evolution of Russian phraseological units in the context of globalization and intercultural communication.
References
1. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
2. Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the internet. Cambridge University Press.
3. Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations of sociolinguistics. University of Pennsylvania Press.
4. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
5. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (2012). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Wiley-Blackwell.
6. Yuldasheva, S. (2024). Key factors in the study of Russian literature. Молодые ученые, 2(32), 95–97.
7. Юлдашева, С. Ю. (2021). Функционально-семантическое поле наречных фразеологизмов. Мировая наука, 202–204.
8. Yusufovna, Y. S. (2022). The phenomenon of ambiguity in the phraseological system of the Russian language. Central Asian Journal of Social Sciences and History, 3(11), 165–169.
9. Yusufovna, Y. S. (2023). Phraseological units in the course of Russian as a foreign language: On the issue of selection conditions and methods of study. JournalNX, 9(1), 193–197.
10. Yusufovna, Y. S. (2024). The motive of madness in the novels of Edgar Allan Poe. Western European Journal of Linguistics and Education, 2(11), 114–117.
11. Yusufovna, Y. S. (2025). “Congratulations” as a manifestation of folk culture. Web of Humanities: Journal of Social Science and Humanitarian Research, 3(5), 87–92.
